Log in to check your private messages 
Username: Password:   
  Reformed Theology Institute
  RTI, founded July 2008, is a venue for Reformed theology, education, training, and discussion.
Index  FAQ  Search  Memberlist  Usergroups  Profile Scroll to Bottom  RTI Portal New Posts Since Last Visit
Recent Posts    
    Join! (free)   
 

Log in
   Username:
   Password:
   Log me on automatically each visit
  
Welcome
Guest

IP Address: 54.80.10.30


Useful Resources

RTI Main Menu
Home Page
Forums
How-To FAQs
Membership Central
Photo/Doc Gallery
Private Messages
Smilies
Bible Encyclopedia
Bible Tool

RTI Announcements
Crowdfunding for RTI Web Site Server Administrators
TNARS Degree Study Discussion Forums Closed
Help RTI Grow
Hotmail Email Domain No Longer Supported for Members
Adopt a Smiley $$ Campaign
Welcome New Members!
RTI Standards of Conduct
Before You Post: Review The SoF and Rules of Conduct
RTI Statement of Faith
About RTI

RTI Latest Topics
RTI RTOW: Who has had the greatest impact on my life?
Heaven, the firmament and the waters

RTI Popular Topics
How to refute Landmark Baptists?
Preferences On NA28 or UBS 5th editions
Should we base theology on end of Mark's Gospel?
Greek Grammar In Light of Historical Research
The New Jerusalem and Righteousness
2 Peter 3:9 and word "all"
What book is good for those new to the faith?
Indwelling versus Infilling of the Holy Spirit
What is difference perservation of saints/eternal security?
Puritan Reformed Ministries in India



 
Jump to:  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Reformed Theology Institute Forum Index » New Testament » Should we base theology on end of Mark's Gospel? Page Previous  1, 2
Author Message

joebonni


Sustaining Member



Joined: 23 Feb 2013
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 65
Rep Level: 5
Rep Points: 10
Rep Hits: 2

Location: Santa Monica, CA
Rep This Post

PostPosted: 01-17-2017 5:54 pm
Post Number: 25865
 Reply with quote

DrWhofan1 wrote:
Hitch wrote:
DrWhofan1 wrote:
Hitch wrote:
joebonni wrote:
I see what you are saying the ending of Mark Chapter 16 Verses 9 on Most Reformed Covenant Pastors I have heard preach this will not preach it they stop before the long ending.  These same pastors will explain why they don't preach it mostly because they feel it was added later and not part of the gospel.



Doesnt that notion  brings the entire  NT  under suspicion ?


Not really, for the maindoctrines of the Faith would not be effected, and we want to get to what theoriginal book had as conclusion....
Im not aware of the Reformed doctrine that teaches 'some Scripture' is reliable.


ALL Scripture is indeed reliable, but the question is wasthe longer ending actually part of the original Scripture?



Dr Whofan1,

First off I love your questions they really make me think and I love that.  I went back and read the end of Mark and yeah it's been many years since I have even looked at that so I looked new to me for like 5 minutes.  Anyway I see what you are saying it's a very wacky ending not really sure what the point was but when they just had the Textus Receptus to go by and some other fragments that is the normal ending.  Since that time we have found way older text and that ending was not there so that's were the problem kinda started.  I just double checked and I have the 1560 Geneva Bible, 1599 Geneva Bible and the 1611 King James Version and they all treat that as a normal ending but remember that;s all they had back then.  I have an idea if you teach or preach and use one of the older versions go ahead and use the verses 9 thru 20 and if you use the newer versions just explain what happened or preach it it's really up to you..............
_________________
I am very simple and I love the Lord and reading about His Plan and Praying to Him.  I love to listen to music all the time and I love to spend lots of time with my wife .........

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Find all posts by user

DrWhofan1


RTI Guru



Joined: 20 Oct 2014
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 861
Rep Level: 4
Rep Points: 25
Rep Hits: 7


Rep This Post

PostPosted: 01-18-2017 7:15 am
Post Number: 25867
Reply with quote

joebonni wrote:
DrWhofan1 wrote:
Hitch wrote:
DrWhofan1 wrote:
Hitch wrote:
joebonni wrote:
I see what you are saying the ending of Mark Chapter 16 Verses 9 on Most Reformed Covenant Pastors I have heard preach this will not preach it they stop before the long ending.  These same pastors will explain why they don't preach it mostly because they feel it was added later and not part of the gospel.



Doesnt that notion  brings the entire  NT  under suspicion ?


Not really, for the maindoctrines of the Faith would not be effected, and we want to get to what theoriginal book had as conclusion....
Im not aware of the Reformed doctrine that teaches 'some Scripture' is reliable.


ALL Scripture is indeed reliable, but the question is wasthe longer ending actually part of the original Scripture?



Dr Whofan1,

First off I love your questions they really make me think and I love that.  I went back and read the end of Mark and yeah it's been many years since I have even looked at that so I looked new to me for like 5 minutes.  Anyway I see what you are saying it's a very wacky ending not really sure what the point was but when they just had the Textus Receptus to go by and some other fragments that is the normal ending.  Since that time we have found way older text and that ending was not there so that's were the problem kinda started.  I just double checked and I have the 1560 Geneva Bible, 1599 Geneva Bible and the 1611 King James Version and they all treat that as a normal ending but remember that;s all they had back then.  I have an idea if you teach or preach and use one of the older versions go ahead and use the verses 9 thru 20 and if you use the newer versions just explain what happened or preach it it's really up to you..............


That is correct, as the Kjv and Nkjv would be based off the TR geek text, and so would have that longer ending as the normal one, but those such as Nas/Niv/Esv, who used the Critical Greek text, would have notes saying longer ending not supported by best manuscripts.

My concern would be that I came out from Charasmatic circles, and they use that long endingto support some of their bad theology!

View user's profile Send private message Find all posts by user

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Reformed Theology Institute Forum Index » New Testament Page Previous  1, 2


 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Back to top




Welcome To RTI Guest!



ip-location

free counters

Optional full banner
Archive

RTI Statement of Faith

Sola Scriptura Sola Fide Sola Gratia Solus Christus Soli Deo Gloria

Beza Calvin Knox Luther Melanchthon Tyndale Zwingli





Listen to RefNet

phpBB skin developed by: John Olson
Powered by
phpBB © 2001-2012 phpBB Group