Log in to check your private messages 
Username: Password:   
  Reformed Theology Institute
  RTI, founded July 2008, is a venue for Reformed theology, education, training, and discussion.
Index  FAQ  Search  Memberlist  Usergroups  Profile Scroll to Bottom  RTI Portal New Posts Since Last Visit
Recent Posts    
    Join! (free)   
 

Log in
   Username:
   Password:
   Log me on automatically each visit
  
Welcome
Guest

IP Address: 54.196.24.102


Useful Resources

RTI Main Menu
Home Page
Forums
How-To FAQs
Membership Central
Photo/Doc Gallery
Private Messages
Smilies
Bible Encyclopedia
Bible Tool

RTI Announcements
Crowdfunding for RTI Web Site Server Administrators
TNARS Degree Study Discussion Forums Closed
Help RTI Grow
Hotmail Email Domain No Longer Supported for Members
Adopt a Smiley $$ Campaign
Welcome New Members!
RTI Standards of Conduct
Before You Post: Review The SoF and Rules of Conduct
RTI Statement of Faith
About RTI

RTI Latest Topics
Toghrul - Hello from Turkey!

RTI Popular Topics
How to refute Landmark Baptists?
Preferences On NA28 or UBS 5th editions
Should we base theology on end of Mark's Gospel?
Greek Grammar In Light of Historical Research
2 Peter 3:9 and word "all"
The New Jerusalem and Righteousness
What book is good for those new to the faith?
NKJV Bible search
What is difference perservation of saints/eternal security?
Indwelling versus Infilling of the Holy Spirit



 
Jump to:  
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Reformed Theology Institute Forum Index » Covenantalism » Is Reconstructionism part of Reformed Theology?
Author Message

DrWhofan1


RTI Guru



Joined: 20 Oct 2014
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 861
Rep Level: 4
Rep Points: 25
Rep Hits: 7


Rep This Post

PostPosted: 02-08-2017 7:18 am
Post Number: 25920
 Reply with quote

Is Reconstructionism part of Reformed Theology?
As that movement seems to be associated with more reformed viewpoints.

Moderator Note:
Please do not create a thread title that is accompanied by a post that does not include the substance of the thread title. A person reading a quote of your opening post would be confused when it only contains "As that movement seems....etc". The reader would wonder what "that movement" refers to. I have edited your opening post accordingly. Thread titles should never be mere introductory clauses to a sentence completed in the opening post accompanying the thread title.

View user's profile Send private message Find all posts by user

Ask Mr. Religion


Admin



Joined: 28 Jul 2008
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 4764
Rep Level: 5
Rep Points: 211
Rep Hits: 44

Location: Chandler, AZ
Rep This Post

PostPosted: 02-08-2017 8:59 am
Post Number: 25922
Reply with quote

DrWhofan1 wrote:
Is Reconstructionism part of Reformed Theology?
As that movement seems to be associated with more reformed viewpoints.

What and who have you read related to Christian Reconstructionism?

How and where do you draw a connection between what you have read and the traditional Reformed historical confessions?

Let's first see what you have thought out as an answer to your own question.

If you want to know what is Reformed theology, read and study the Westminster Standards, Helvetic, Belgic or Heidelberg confessions. Then you can post a question that ties what you have read in the confessions to your topic.

I am growing increasingly impatient with your frequent questions, "Is this or that Reformed theology?" The site is not a vending machine. I do not generally mind questions. I do mind them when they are asked far more frequently than the average person. You ask too many. Why? Because you do not study deeply and often. Unfortunately, we enable this behavior by answering all the questions that just pop into your head. For you, it is better to just jump in the site and ask a question than it is to dig into the resources you have available to you and discover the answers you are seeking.

After you have spent real effort at trying to determine an answer to a question in your mind, and are unable to settle the question, then perhaps it is time to ask it to a broader audience. When you do, include some background about what is leading you to ask the question.
_________________
AMR (a.k.a. Patrick)
Arizona Arizona, it's a dry heat!

Do You Confess?
Faculty PRBS
My Randomata Blog


View user's profile Send private message Find all posts by user Visit poster's website

DrWhofan1


RTI Guru



Joined: 20 Oct 2014
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 861
Rep Level: 4
Rep Points: 25
Rep Hits: 7


Rep This Post

PostPosted: 02-08-2017 1:09 pm
Post Number: 25924
Reply with quote

Ask Mr. Religion wrote:
DrWhofan1 wrote:
Is Reconstructionism part of Reformed Theology?
As that movement seems to be associated with more reformed viewpoints.

What and who have you read related to Christian Reconstructionism?

How and where do you draw a connection between what you have read and the traditional Reformed historical confessions?

Let's first see what you have thought out as an answer to your own question.

If you want to know what is Reformed theology, read and study the Westminster Standards, Helvetic, Belgic or Heidelberg confessions. Then you can post a question that ties what you have read in the confessions to your topic.

I am growing increasingly impatient with your frequent questions, "Is this or that Reformed theology?" The site is not a vending machine. I do not generally mind questions. I do mind them when they are asked far more frequently than the average person. You ask too many. Why? Because you do not study deeply and often. Unfortunately, we enable this behavior by answering all the questions that just pop into your head. For you, it is better to just jump in the site and ask a question than it is to dig into the resources you have available to you and discover the answers you are seeking.

After you have spent real effort at trying to determine an answer to a question in your mind, and are unable to settle the question, then perhaps it is time to ask it to a broader audience. When you do, include some background about what is leading you to ask the question.
.

have read some material in the past under believe the author was Rishdoney, and he seemed to be implying that God expects and requires us to take the law as God gave it to israel, and have that rule placed upon the USA now. He seemed to be coming out of a reformed viewpoint, as normally those not regormed would not be linking the Mosaic law to us today in that fashion.

View user's profile Send private message Find all posts by user

Ask Mr. Religion


Admin



Joined: 28 Jul 2008
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 4764
Rep Level: 5
Rep Points: 211
Rep Hits: 44

Location: Chandler, AZ
Rep This Post

PostPosted: 02-08-2017 1:41 pm
Post Number: 25926
Reply with quote

DrWhofan1 wrote:

have read some material in the past under believe the author was Rishdoney, and he seemed to be implying that God expects and requires us to take the law as God gave it to israel, and have that rule placed upon the USA now. He seemed to be coming out of a reformed viewpoint, as normally those not regormed would not be linking the Mosaic law to us today in that fashion.


We have discussed this often: Please take more care in your posts as relates to grammar. It is unfair to the readers to have to frequently parse your posts in order to properly understand them. Was it really too difficult for you to have crafted your post as follows:

    I have read some material in the past and believe the author was Rushdooney. He seemed to be implying that God expects and requires us to take the law as God gave it to Israel, and have that rule placed upon the USA now. He seemed to be coming out of a Reformed viewpoint, as normally those not Reformed would not be linking the Mosaic law to us today in that fashion.


I believe you have told me in the past that English is not your second language, so I am not going to wink at your frequent butchery of our language. There is no need to be so careless. It is disrespectful to the readers. Take special care using your tablet, smart phone, computer or whatever when making posts.

I have to question your statement that you have read material and "believe the author" was Rushdooney. No one reads what Rushdooney has written and not know he wrote it. I think you are being fast and loose with the facts of the matter in hopes of getting past my earlier request that you pose questions with some substance behind the questions.
_________________
AMR (a.k.a. Patrick)
Arizona Arizona, it's a dry heat!

Do You Confess?
Faculty PRBS
My Randomata Blog


View user's profile Send private message Find all posts by user Visit poster's website

Ask Mr. Religion


Admin



Joined: 28 Jul 2008
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 4764
Rep Level: 5
Rep Points: 211
Rep Hits: 44

Location: Chandler, AZ
Rep This Post

PostPosted: 02-08-2017 1:53 pm
Post Number: 25927
Reply with quote

Just because someone who is Reformed makes some statements about this or that concerning Scripture, in no way necessarily implies that what they have written is to be taken as part and parcel historical Reformed theology.

Rushdooney rejects the covenant of works, so there is that issue with actual historical Reformed theology...for starters. Wink Read him if you are interested in sub-Reformed ethical and social theories related to what is called Reconstructionism. He was a brilliant fellow, but quite the quirky one. His systematic is worth a read, but not one recommended as a proper introduction to solid Reformed doctrines.
_________________
AMR (a.k.a. Patrick)
Arizona Arizona, it's a dry heat!

Do You Confess?
Faculty PRBS
My Randomata Blog


View user's profile Send private message Find all posts by user Visit poster's website

larry joseph pearson


Invested Member



Joined: 12 Oct 2011
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 167
Rep Level: 5
Rep Points: 29
Rep Hits: 6

Location: Gadsden,Alabama 35901
Rep This Post

PostPosted: 02-08-2017 5:41 pm
Post Number: 25928
Reply with quote

Hello Dr.Whofan1, The Reconstructionist movement was given impetus by Rousas John Rushdoony by publication of his " magnum opos" The Institutes of Biblical Law in 1973 by The Craig Press. He modeled it after Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion. Rushdoony started the Chalcedon Foundation now run by his son Mark. Another Reconstruction site is American Vision began in 1978 by Steve Schiffman.

These persons and their followers are the antipodes of historical Reformed theology. I posted this so in your investigation you may see the chasm that exits between Reformed theology and persons that call themselves Calvinists in the Reconstruction Movement. I only enclosed this in case you wanted to investigate further. There are others in this movement that I have failed to mention. God bless you!



Think

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Find all posts by user Visit poster's website

DrWhofan1


RTI Guru



Joined: 20 Oct 2014
postcomment
postcomment
Posts: 861
Rep Level: 4
Rep Points: 25
Rep Hits: 7


Rep This Post

PostPosted: 02-09-2017 6:47 am
Post Number: 25930
Reply with quote

Ask Mr. Religion wrote:
Just because someone who is Reformed makes some statements about this or that concerning Scripture, in no way necessarily implies that what they have written is to be taken as part and parcel historical Reformed theology.

Rushdooney rejects the covenant of works, so there is that issue with actual historical Reformed theology...for starters. Wink Read him if you are interested in sub-Reformed ethical and social theories related to what is called Reconstructionism. He was a brilliant fellow, but quite the quirky one. His systematic is worth a read, but not one recommended as a proper introduction to solid Reformed doctrines.


He rejeted the reformed Covenant of Works, so would that mean that he viewed the Mosaic Law given to israel as not being just for the Old Covenant era, but to be the Law God gave to regulate morality and to apply to all nations since then? That would seem to be a theoracy, is that all those in his movement would term it being?

This concept seems to be akin to what was introduced to while in Charasmatic circles, Gary Demarr and His reduction of Christianity, as he also afgued for something like a post mil view that woulkd have th Law and God standards mandated i all nations, especially here in the USA?

View user's profile Send private message Find all posts by user

Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Reformed Theology Institute Forum Index » Covenantalism


 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Back to top




Welcome To RTI Guest!